Z2K response to Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Act DWP Codes of Practice consultation

Published February 2026

New powers to directly request claimant bank account information, introduced under the PA(FER) Act, risks exposing more people who rely on social security payments to the risk of incorrect benefit suspensions. Incorrect universal credit suspensions can have severe consequences, pushing claimants – often reliant on it as their sole income – into hardship, debt, and homelessness.

While supporting efforts to reduce fraud, this consultation response calls for the Code of Practice on these powers to include stronger safeguards, clearer limits on powers, improved transparency, and robust protections to ensure fairness and avoid harm to legitimate claimants.

Z2K is an anti-poverty charity working to end UK poverty through providing expert frontline advice and representation services and campaigning for change. In 2025, our advice services provided in-depth support to 764 people with issues related to social security and housing. This included advising people who have been told they have been overpaid benefit or who have had their payments suspended. We regularly publish research and analysis relating to the social security system, including a short briefing setting out our view of the initial publication of the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Act (‘the PAFER Act’) and more detailed research like Ending the Culture of Fear, our recent report on the PIP assessment.

This consultation response focuses on the Eligibility Verification Measure (EVM) Code of Practice, and addresses consultation questions 15, 16 and 32 (relating to the use of the data obtained under the EVM). We disagree that chapter 3 clearly explains how the Department for Work and Pensions will use EVM information, and believe that there are several areas that the EVM Code of Practice has not sufficiently considered. We are of the view that, as currently drafted, the Code of Practice (‘the Code’) does not provide sufficient safeguards against the risk of people entitled to support being pushed into significant financial hardship, destitution and homelessness by having their payments wrongly suspended or terminated as a result of being flagged by data obtained under the EVM.

Z2K's recommendations

  1. The Code should include a clear and comprehensive list of relevant non-EVM information, aligned to each eligibility indicator, that must be reviewed before an EVM-linked suspension is applied.
  2. The Code should require that, where a question about someone’s entitlement has arisen as a result of EVM information, the DWP must attempt to contact the affected individual and give them at least one month to provide evidence demonstrating their entitlement prior to suspending their payment.
  3. The Code should include an exhaustive list of the different types of eligibility indicators the DWP plans to use under the EVM.
  4. The Code should mandate that EVM information must not result in a payment suspension where there is reason to believe that an affected person would be at risk of hardship as a result.
More on Personal Independence Payments (PIP)